• Columns 

    Ghosts of Comics’ Past: 1990

    By | July 20th, 2020
    Posted in Columns | % Comments

    Multiversity’s history column is back with an overview of the comic industry circa 1990.

    The overall market
    In 1990, the direct market was made up of about 1000 individual shops. Although they were vastly outnumbered by newsstand outlets like grocery stores and gas stations, these specialty stores represented almost 85% of comics sold. While the newsstand spinner racks were essential for hooking new customers, fans found comic shops superior in selection, condition, and timing. The selection was better thanks to direct market exclusive titles, but also because of back issues that allowed readers to catch up on stories they missed. The condition of the books was better because the newsstands would stuff comics on the racks without concern for creases, bends, or tears. Meanwhile, comic shops were pushing protective bags and boards, and were extra careful when handling books because mint copies could be sold for more money. The timing was better because comic shops put new books on sale two weeks before the same books could be displayed on newsstands.

    The general mood in the direct market was that DC was on its way up, and Marvel was on its way down. The Batmania following the 1989 Michael Keaton / Jack Nicholson film was still going strong and boosting DC’s superhero line. At the same time, the success of Neil Gaiman’s “Sandman” and other British Invasion works by Warren Ellis, Grant Morrison, and Garth Ennis were drawing attention the mainstream press’ attention to DC’s mature titles. Behind the scenes, the editor and creators behind the Superman titles had started having retreats to work out upcoming ideas and strengthen continuity between themselves, resulting in a superior product.

    Marvel, on the other hand, seemed to be misfiring everywhere. Their films and TV shows were awful. The New Universe experiment was over, but the bad taste wasn’t gone yet. Worse than that, the last couple X-Men events had under performed. Worse still, Jack Kirby gave an interview to “The Comics Journal” where he described Stan Lee as a talentless thief who stole credit from the real creators, souring some fans on the classic stories. Insiders saw that the Marvel Age had ended, and they expected DC to return to its place as the market leader.

    McFarlane, Spider-Man, and the way of the future
    Todd McFarlane had made a name for himself in the late 1980s as an artist with work on “Incredible Hulk” and “Amazing Spider-Man”, particularly with the introduction of Venom. By 1990, he was ready to try something new, something really different. He told his editor on ASM, Jim Salicrup, that he would like to switch to a book where he would be allowed to write as well as draw. As an untested writer, he didn’t ask for anything specific and expected to be given something low on the totem pole, like “Daredevil” or “Cloak & Dagger”. Instead, Salicrup offered him a brand new Spider-Man book with the option to ignore the continuity of the three existing ones.

    Marvel wanted a big push behind the new title, so the marketing team looked for ways to make it something special. Carol Kalish planned a silver ink cover for the direct market, and a poly bagged version was planned for the newsstand. “Spider-Man” #1 was a huge hit, a record setter with multiple reprintings, and Marvel wanted to thank retailers with a special edition. The manufacturing department spent five months and over $35,000 working out the kinks for the limited platinum edition of “Spider-Man” #1. During those trials, they learned how to do other tricks like embossing and foil stamps, which they soon unleashed on the market at every opportunity.

    Seduction of the Innocent Revisited
    At the peak of the anti-comics hysteria in the early 1950s, Frederic Wertham wrote “Seduction of the Innocent”, a populist pillaging of comics filled with anonymous anecdotes and capricious claims. Parents were persuaded, and publishers were panicked. The CCA was formed, and comic content was neutered, reduced to childish stories and losing a generation or two of adult readers. Mature content crept back slowly through code revisions and a direct market accepting of comics without the CCA seal. When the content became questionable once again, former comic store owner John Fulce stood up to defend traditional American values with the 1990 book “Comic Books Exposed: Seduction of the Innocent Revisited”.

    Continued below

    This 200-page diatribe criticized comics from a religious point of view and advocated for stricter content restrictions. For someone who used to be a fan, Fulce seems woefully unfamiliar with anything outside of mainstream comics published before 1975. Despite the allusion to Wertham in the title, Fulce never actually references Wertham or anything else from that era of criticism. Calling his book “Seduction of the Innocent Revisited” without actually revisiting Wertham is bizarre. He does share a penchant for strawman arguments and unfounded claims, however.

    Fulce’s book failed to fuel public opinion the way Wertham’s did. Perhaps it was his lack of an authoritative title like “psychologist”. Perhaps it was his lack of convincing anecdotes. Perhaps it was because his audience had grown up on comics and turned out fine. Perhaps it was just bad timing, because there were video games and CDs to blame instead of books. Whatever the reason(s) may be, we should all consider ourselves lucky that this book is a footnote of a footnote on comic history instead of a whole chapter.


    //TAGS | Ghosts of Comics' Past

    Drew Bradley

    Drew Bradley is a long time comic reader whose past contributions to Multiversity include the Minding MIND MGMT, Small Press Spotlight, and Tradewaiter columns, along with Lettering Week and Variant Coverage. He currently writes history-based articles. Feel free to email him about these things, or any other comic related topic.

    EMAIL | ARTICLES


  • Columns
    Ghosts of Comics’ Past: August in Comics History – An Early Superheroine, a Racial Slur, and Misty

    By | Aug 3, 2020 | Columns

    It’s the first Monday of the month, which means it’s time for Multiversity’s history column. This installment will look at the first costumed superheroine, a racial misunderstanding put to good use, and an effort to make comics appeal to young girls.August 1940I’ve been writing this column for almost two years now, and I’ve discovered that […]

    MORE »
    Columns
    Ghosts of Comics’ Past: 1980

    By | Jun 15, 2020 | Columns

    Multiversity’s history column returns with a variety of items from 1980, including a review of the direct market, the back issue market, and the effects of the growing independent comic scene.Growth of the Direct MarketFollowing some legal decisions in 1979, the Direct Market was growing faster than ever. There were about 3000 comic specialty shops […]

    MORE »

    -->